So I really enjoyed Jim's talk tonight - enlightening, inspiring, challenging and reaffirming. Thank you. 

One question I struggle with when thinking about learning and idenity development is how to identify and measure growth.  Learning seems a bit easier to grasp (maybe because we have more experience with trying to measure and identify growth with respect to learning) than the long-term and more wholistic notion of identity development.  Jim talks about identity work as becoming a certain kind of person (as seen in what he calls a "combination:" the certain way a person talks, certain clothes a person wears, etc.), but this notion seems hard to define or describe in a "whole"-way.  Ideas? Thoughts?